Dr. David Sunding, an economist on the faculty of the University of California-Berkeley and a principal with The Brattle Group, has completed a review of the Environmental Protection Agency’s economic analysis of the proposed rule on “Waters of the United States.” His “Review of 2014 EPA Economic Analysis of Proposed Revised Definition of Waters of the Unites States” finds that the EPA has drastically expanded jurisdiction under this proposed rule, and has failed to fully consider the economic impacts on businesses and affected communities.
Dr. Sunding’s review was completed for the Waters Advocacy Council, which represents the nation’s construction, real estate, mining, agriculture, wildlife conservation, forestry, manufacturing and energy sectors.
The report can be read in full here:
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.
Continuing the Discussion
EPA analysis of Water Rule found flawed |
[…] report, Review of 2014 EPA Economic Analysis of Proposed Revised Definition of Waters of the Unites States, raises the blinds on the controversial proposal by detailing how EPA failed to provide a realistic […]May 29, 20148:47 pm
NAWG Weekly Update: May 29, 2014 « National Association of Wheat Growers
[…] Waters Advocacy Coalition Reviews Waters of U.S. The Waters Advocacy Coalition released a report this week reviewing the economic assumptions by the EPA in the proposed regulation on Waters of the U.S. The report, conducted by an economist at the University of California-Berkeley indicated that the proposed regulation failed to fully consider the economic impacts on businesses and those impacted by the regulation. To view the full report visit: http://www.nssga.org/economist-reviews-epas-economic-analysis-proposed-waters-united-states-rule/. […]May 29, 20149:06 pm