![]() |
|||
| June 28, 2006 | Volume 6, Issue 17 | ||
|
|
|||
| Pamela J. Whitted, Vice President, Government Affairs Jim Riley, Director, Government Affairs John Boling, Director, Government Affairs Patricia Maeder, Division Coordinator
|
LINKS www.nssga.org Action Center e-Digest |
||
|
In This Edition...
|
|||
EXPLOSIVES USER TAX STRIPPED FROM HOUSE BILLThe House of Representatives is scheduled to vote today on passage of the FY '07 Science, State and Justice (SSJ) appropriations bill. A controversial provision allowing for a half-cent per ton tax on makers and importers of explosives was stripped out of the legislation on June 27 when Rep. Alan Mollohan (D-W.Va.) raised a point of order against the provision. The point of order against legislating on an appropriations bill was sustained thus deleting the provision from the measure. NSSGA has repeatedly opposed the administration's reoccurring proposal to include up to two-cents per ton tax to help fund the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, by generating about $120 million per year. NSSGA worked closely with its partners in the Safety & Security Alliance for Explosives to ensure the tax was struck from the House bill. Our attention now turns to the Senate where we hope the House action will assist in discouraging the Senate appropriators from including an explosives tax in their version of the SSJ spending bill. We will continue to keep you updated on developments.
The House of Representatives is set to take up H.R. 5689, a bill that would make technical corrections to SAFETEA-LU, under suspension of the rules (requiring a two-thirds majority vote for passage) on June 28. The main area to be tackled is the section detailing surface transportation research programs. Due to confusion during the conference committee process, more than 100 percent of the available research funds were allocated. The correction deducts two-tenths of one percent from the primary highway formula programs in 2006-2009 and diverts that money into the research program to pay for the over-earmarking. NSSGA is analyzing the technical corrections bill to determine if it addresses the share split on the construction materials research and to insure the aggregate industry's interests are protected.
| |||
|
Portions of this e-mail contain advertising and solicitations for member-related products and services.
| |||